Skip to main content

On the Post-COVID Economy

Inflation, supply chain issues, bare shelves...who coulda predicted this? Well, just about any rational informed person, actually...

I don't consider myself prescient just pragmatic, realistic. Cynical, even. In April 2020, when all this was spooling up, I noted on social media that, paraphrased, "We better be real careful how we shut down this economic engine, because none of us has the starter battery and know-how to do it."

Sadly, I was right. It's not that we are not smart; in aggregate, as a whole economy, we're remarkably intelligent. The things we're able to do as a collective macro-economy is incredibly immense: how is it that, prior to March 2020, anything that we could ever want was available to us on the grocery store shelf or even available as soon as same-day or (at worst) two-day delivery? How was that possible? Who designed that?

"Who designed that?" Well, no one. An economy is not a "who" but a "what".  And that "what" was our aggregate efforts in a (mainly) free economy. There's not a sole "who" (or even selected group of "whos") that figured this all out; it's the combined efforts of literally billions of people working together, unplanned, undirected, to provide to us what we wanted.

Economies are similar to a murmuration of European Starlings that create beautiful patterns through the ebb and flow of swirling bodies. There's not one King Starling calling out moves to the flock; instead it's one Starling making a minor move that signals to each of the birds nearby to move, which then signals to their next birds to move...and so on. Almost instantaneously. No one bird can central-plan the the flock's next move to change directions quickly or avoid a predator; instead it is a series of nearly-instant signals moving throughout the flock's aggregate flight paths that make it happen....fluidly.

Such it is with a free market economy. Billions of signals -- pricing, demand, supply -- murmuring through the "flock" tell the next "bird" what needs to be done. Those signals build and spread over time, fluidly, to level out a demand/supply chain that ensures that the suppliers provide what the consumers want, at the price they're willing to pay for it, at near-silently-agreed-upon timing.

But then COVID hit, along with its resultant Central Planning and teh shut down of major chunks of our economy, both in supply and demand. These mandates broke those fluid signals and agreements, placing the supply chain into unknown - and undesired - territory.

It's just not possible for a King Of The Economy to begin waving his wand, making demands for instant change, without putting this perfectly-balanced and -unplanned system into chaos. But that's exactly what we tried to do when we shut down our various micro-economies in 2020. We suddenly shut off the spigots of demand by telling people to stay home; instantly shut off supply by decided and declaring which industries were "essential" and which were not. We tried to, in effect, centrally plan the economy for an amount time...and we destroyed that elegant murmuring of signals. It's as if we had reached into the flock of starlings, killed off some, relocated others to another part of the world, and caged the rest, and then when it suited our fancy we tried to release them all into the wild and expected them to immediately go back to normal.

It just doesn't work that way.

I was reminded of this concept as I read a couple columns today, linked below. I'd suggest most of our world does not understand these evolved, delicate, unplanned, economic balances, so we're looking to the wrong place for answers. Ironically, we're looking for answers from the same groups that caused the chaos...we instantly destroyed these balances that were created over time, so we have to realize that it will take even more time for these to balances to realign.

Given the opportunity - given the freedom - they eventually will.

But if we think we can use central planning to suddenly mandate the re-balance, an imbalance that was caused by the central planning itself, then we may never recover, certainly not to the level we were before. If we continue that mandate route then we will certainly re-balance but to a new paradigm of that central planning, within those limits, and it won't be as good as it was before.

So my suggestion is, "Don't just do something, sit there." Please.

There’s No ‘Supply-Chain Shortage,’ Or Inflation. There’s Just Central Planning - John Tammy

Of Pencils and Miracles - Jeff Jacoby

"I, Pencil" -- Leonard Read

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On "Microsquirting" the Porsche 914 - Part 2, Which Aftermarket Fuel Injection System?

Which Aftermarket Fuel Injection System? Return to Part 1 Scenario: two Porsche 914s, one 2L 4-banger street car with stock engine, one 2L 4-banger race car with modded engine. Greg's street 914 The street car engine has a fully-functioning Bosch D-Jetronic system, but as noted in Part 1 I don't trust it. It seems to work great at times but every now and then, usually when I'm an hour away from home, it'll have this massive burp and run bad for a bit. Makes me nervous. And it seems to be extremely sensitive to fuel selection; a couple times it just did not like the fuel I got from some stations. The race car's engine is modified and uses dual Dellorto carburetors. I have given thought to preparing prepping it to SCCA's Limited Prep Production regs, which requires fuel injection using the stock throttle body and intake manifold. Combine the two needs and maybe I can mod the street car and learn something about EFI in the process that could apply to

On "Microsquirting" the Porsche 914

Bosch D-Jetronic The Bosch D-Jetronic system is pretty cool, especially when you consider it was designed in the 1960s. "Computer"-controlled electronic fuel injection with manifold pressure sensor, intake temperature sensor, crankshaft (well, distributor) angle sensor, and throttle position sensor/switch. It uses constant fuel pressure and flow, so only injection duration needs to be modified to control air/fuel mixture. It measures incoming airflow by monitoring the intake manifold pressure; engine speed, temperature, and other factors are monitored for the purpose of fine-tuning injection duration. Ignition is by a standard cam-driven distributor with an internal D-jet-specific pickup for the crank/cam angle position. This "speed-density" D-Jet system was used on many cars of the period, including Volvo, Jaguar, Volkswagen, and of course, the Porsche 914 (1.7L and 2L engines only; the 1.8L used L-Jetronic -- "L" for "luft" or "air&qu

On "Microsquirting" the Porsche 914 - Part 3, The Design

The Design Return to Part 2 Recall my design parameters so far: Use the stock intake manifold(s) and throttle body; Use stock injectors; Use stock fuel pump and pressure regulator; Replace D-Jet components only when it makes sense; Upgrade fuel injection only, ignition to follow later; Bolt-on wherever possible so others can install it; Should not require permanent mods to stock components (so it can be reverted); Price-sensitive -- keep as inexpensive as possible. I quickly learned early on I had one conflict: the D-Jet system uses "low impedance injectors" and the Microsquirt system needs "high impendance injectors". I'll lead you to this link if you want to learn the difference but it basically comes down to electrical resistance. I could use the D-Jet injectors if I added a resistor pack -- which is exactly what VW/Porsche did when they used similar injectors on the L-Jet system for the 1.8L 914 engine.  FiveO High Impedance Injectors