Skip to main content

A Phrase It's Time To Retire

"So sorry for your loss".

Life is full of tragedies; death is but one of them. When someone we know, someone we care about has a loss, we feel compelled to say...something. We want them to know that they're in our thoughts, in our prayers, that they know we care and that we're there to support them.

A decade or more ago, we stammered for the words. In times of tragedy or loss we needed to something to say, but we didn't have those comforting words. The awkwardness increased as the Internet and social media grew, and we were more closely associated with our friends, no longer separated by distance and time. Then, slowly, a phrase was born that allowed us to express our empathy, easily.

"I'm truly sorry for your loss".

A simple phrase, but it acknowledges and empathizes with the loss, and can open a dialog where we can further discuss our shared grief.

Recently, however, this simple phrase has become a trite habit. Instead of using the phrase to open a dialog, it has become a impersonal acknowledgement of the loss, neither requiring - nor expecting - further discussion. It has become a Facebook "unlike".

Go to any social media post where someone has lost a loved one, and you'll see comment after comment after comment of nothing more than minor (or zero) variations of that same over-used phrase.

"So sorry for your loss".

Nothing else. Just that. Not "I'm truly sorry for the grief you must be feeling from the loss of your parent". No recalled memories of the loved one, no interesting anecdotes of how that person may have affected the commenter's life, no discussions or recognition of how that person's loved one affected them. Few, if any, variations whether the loss was a spouse, parent, child, sibling, or even a cat or dog.

"Sorry for your loss".

Just as simple as a click of a button, the sadly-overused phrase now appears as a checkbox, a desire just to be seen empathizing.

A decade ago this phrase was a simple and acceptable way for us to recognize a person's loss and affirm our ties with them. But with social media growing up and becoming a big part of our society, we need to grow up as well. I suggest that any time we feel compelled to post this comment in recognition of a loss, we need to stop and think about what we really mean, what we're really trying to say. And we need to do it using our own words, not by using an overused phrase.

Otherwise, just hit the "Sad" button and move on.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On "Microsquirting" the Porsche 914 - Part 2, Which Aftermarket Fuel Injection System?

Which Aftermarket Fuel Injection System? Return to Part 1 Scenario: two Porsche 914s, one 2L 4-banger street car with stock engine, one 2L 4-banger race car with modded engine. Greg's street 914 The street car engine has a fully-functioning Bosch D-Jetronic system, but as noted in Part 1 I don't trust it. It seems to work great at times but every now and then, usually when I'm an hour away from home, it'll have this massive burp and run bad for a bit. Makes me nervous. And it seems to be extremely sensitive to fuel selection; a couple times it just did not like the fuel I got from some stations. The race car's engine is modified and uses dual Dellorto carburetors. I have given thought to preparing prepping it to SCCA's Limited Prep Production regs, which requires fuel injection using the stock throttle body and intake manifold. Combine the two needs and maybe I can mod the street car and learn something about EFI in the process that could apply to

On "Microsquirting" the Porsche 914

Bosch D-Jetronic The Bosch D-Jetronic system is pretty cool, especially when you consider it was designed in the 1960s. "Computer"-controlled electronic fuel injection with manifold pressure sensor, intake temperature sensor, crankshaft (well, distributor) angle sensor, and throttle position sensor/switch. It uses constant fuel pressure and flow, so only injection duration needs to be modified to control air/fuel mixture. It measures incoming airflow by monitoring the intake manifold pressure; engine speed, temperature, and other factors are monitored for the purpose of fine-tuning injection duration. Ignition is by a standard cam-driven distributor with an internal D-jet-specific pickup for the crank/cam angle position. This "speed-density" D-Jet system was used on many cars of the period, including Volvo, Jaguar, Volkswagen, and of course, the Porsche 914 (1.7L and 2L engines only; the 1.8L used L-Jetronic -- "L" for "luft" or "air&qu

On "Microsquirting" the Porsche 914 - Part 3, The Design

The Design Return to Part 2 Recall my design parameters so far: Use the stock intake manifold(s) and throttle body; Use stock injectors; Use stock fuel pump and pressure regulator; Replace D-Jet components only when it makes sense; Upgrade fuel injection only, ignition to follow later; Bolt-on wherever possible so others can install it; Should not require permanent mods to stock components (so it can be reverted); Price-sensitive -- keep as inexpensive as possible. I quickly learned early on I had one conflict: the D-Jet system uses "low impedance injectors" and the Microsquirt system needs "high impendance injectors". I'll lead you to this link if you want to learn the difference but it basically comes down to electrical resistance. I could use the D-Jet injectors if I added a resistor pack -- which is exactly what VW/Porsche did when they used similar injectors on the L-Jet system for the 1.8L 914 engine.  FiveO High Impedance Injectors